Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Case law is specific on the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of the boy or girl tend not to approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they can do if they are able to Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They're directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation contains the names on the parties to the initial case, the court in which the case was read, the date it was decided, along with the book in which it can be recorded. Different citation requirements might incorporate italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
ten. Without touching the merits with the case on the issue of once-a-year increases during the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these types of annual increase, if permissible inside the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment being made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim get more info Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government guidelines for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. As a result, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, as well as respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Problems or Errors Should you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a undesirable link or a portion of an opinion lacking), please notify the eService Center.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be one or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason with the decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted within an argument.
The acquired Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings within the Impugned order, after recording of evidence on the respective parties. Read more